MSFU vs VTI
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSFU | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $773M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 13.70% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -0.82% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | -22.62% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.76% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 51.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
MSFU vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X ETF (MSFU) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSFU returned -22.62% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, MSFU is down 0.82% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, MSFU compounded at +12.76% per year against +21.17% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, MSFU has the edge at +17.10% annualized vs +8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSFU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 51.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.4% for MSFU and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSFU charges 0.98% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $3 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSFU currently yields 13.70% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MSFU and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MSFU | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | 16.39% | 3.81% | 12.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSFU or VTI?
MSFU has an expense ratio of 0.98% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $95 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSFU or VTI?
Over the past year MSFU returned -22.62% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), MSFU annualized +17.10% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSFU or VTI?
MSFU has been the more volatile fund at 51.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MSFU -62.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MSFU and VTI?
MSFU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSFU and VTI?
MSFU and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 3.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSFU or VTI?
MSFU yields 13.70% while VTI yields 1.07%, so MSFU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.