MSFU vs VYM
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSFU | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $773M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 13.70% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +0.07% | +16.10% | |
| 1Y Return | -21.93% | +25.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.55% | +18.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.35% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 51.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
MSFU vs VYM Performance
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X ETF (MSFU) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSFU returned -21.93% while VYM returned +25.99%. Year to date, MSFU is up 0.07% versus a gain of 16.10% for VYM.
Over three years, MSFU compounded at +13.55% per year against +18.29% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, MSFU has the edge at +17.38% annualized vs +7.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSFU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 51.7% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.4% for MSFU and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.16. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSFU charges 0.98% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $4 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSFU currently yields 13.70% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
MSFU and VYM share 0 holdings out of 563 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSFU or VYM?
MSFU has an expense ratio of 0.98% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $94 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSFU or VYM?
Over the past year MSFU returned -21.93% vs +25.99% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), MSFU annualized +17.38% vs +7.08% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSFU or VYM?
MSFU has been the more volatile fund at 51.7% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MSFU -62.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both MSFU and VYM?
MSFU and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.16, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSFU and VYM?
MSFU and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 563 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSFU or VYM?
MSFU yields 13.70% while VYM yields 2.86%, so MSFU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.