MUND vs VOO
Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MUND | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.24% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 99 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +0.28% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.75% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Northern Trust Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 1, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MUND vs VOO Performance
Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUND) is a ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MUND returned +4.75% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, MUND is up 0.28% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 4.3% for MUND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.2% for MUND and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MUND charges 0.18% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MUND currently yields 3.24% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MUND and VOO share 0 holdings out of 538 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MUND or VOO?
MUND has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MUND or VOO?
Over the past year MUND returned +4.75% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), MUND annualized +4.51% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MUND or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 4.3% for MUND. Worst drawdown: MUND -4.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MUND and VOO?
MUND and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MUND and VOO?
MUND and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 538 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MUND or VOO?
MUND yields 3.24% while VOO yields 1.08%, so MUND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.