MUND vs VXUS
Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MUND | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $4M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.78% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 121 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +0.66% | +15.00% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.93% | +26.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Northern Trust Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 1, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
MUND vs VXUS Performance
Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUND) is a ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MUND returned +4.93% while VXUS returned +26.87%. Year to date, MUND is up 0.66% versus a gain of 15.00% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 4.3% for MUND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.2% for MUND and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MUND charges 0.18% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $5 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MUND currently yields 2.78% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
MUND and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7894 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MUND or VXUS?
MUND has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $13 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MUND or VXUS?
Over the past year MUND returned +4.93% vs +26.87% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MUND or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 4.3% for MUND. Worst drawdown: MUND -4.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both MUND and VXUS?
MUND and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MUND and VXUS?
MUND and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7894 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MUND or VXUS?
MUND yields 2.78% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so MUND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.