MWHS vs SCHD
Skylar Electricity Futures ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, MWHS or SCHD?
Managed Futures against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MWHS | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $627,336.68 | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 1 | 103 |
| YTD Return | -18.34% | +24.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +28.14% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.58% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.90% |
| Fund Family | Skylar Capital Management, LP | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Managed Futures | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 26, 2026 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
MWHS vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MWHS vs SCHD Performance
Skylar Electricity Futures ETF (MWHS) is an ETF from Skylar Capital Management, LP and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, MWHS is down 18.34% versus a gain of 24.59% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MWHS charges 0.95% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $6 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MWHS currently yields 0.00% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in MWHS and 100 in SCHD, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in MWHS and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 1 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 1 and 100 positions we hold weights for.
SCHD holds 99 positions MWHS does not, 99.9% of the fund.
Largest: MRK 4.77%, AMGN 4.70%, ABT 4.69%, KO 4.17%, CVX 4.02%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MWHS and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MWHS or SCHD?
MWHS has an expense ratio of 0.95% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $89 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, MWHS or SCHD?
MWHS yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than MWHS?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.