NBGX vs VXUS
Neuberger Berman Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBGX | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $14M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.39% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +7.57% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.15% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 18, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
NBGX vs VXUS Performance
Neuberger Berman Growth ETF (NBGX) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman ETF Trust and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NBGX returned +12.15% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, NBGX is up 7.57% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBGX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.6% for NBGX and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBGX charges 0.44% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $5 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBGX currently yields 0.39% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
NBGX and VXUS share 3 holdings out of 7912 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBGX or VXUS?
NBGX has an expense ratio of 0.44% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $39 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NBGX or VXUS?
Over the past year NBGX returned +12.15% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NBGX annualized +14.09% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NBGX or VXUS?
NBGX has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: NBGX -21.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both NBGX and VXUS?
NBGX and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NBGX and VXUS?
NBGX and VXUS share 3 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7912 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBGX or VXUS?
NBGX yields 0.39% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.