NBGX vs VYM
Neuberger Berman Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBGX | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $15M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.40% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 56 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +5.39% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.90% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 18, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
NBGX vs VYM Performance
Neuberger Berman Growth ETF (NBGX) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman ETF Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NBGX returned +9.90% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, NBGX is up 5.39% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBGX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.6% for NBGX and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBGX charges 0.44% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $4 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBGX currently yields 0.40% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
NBGX and VYM share 13 holdings out of 644 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBGX or VYM?
NBGX has an expense ratio of 0.44% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NBGX or VYM?
Over the past year NBGX returned +9.90% vs +22.16% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NBGX annualized +12.47% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NBGX or VYM?
NBGX has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: NBGX -21.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both NBGX and VYM?
NBGX and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NBGX and VYM?
NBGX and VYM share 13 common holdings with a 15.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 644 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBGX or VYM?
NBGX yields 0.40% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.