NBGX vs VTI
Neuberger Berman Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBGX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $15M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.40% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 56 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.90% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.98% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 18, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
NBGX vs VTI Performance
Neuberger Berman Growth ETF (NBGX) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NBGX returned +10.98% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, NBGX is up 5.90% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBGX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.6% for NBGX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBGX charges 0.44% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $3 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBGX currently yields 0.40% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
NBGX and VTI share 46 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 40.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBGX or VTI?
NBGX has an expense ratio of 0.44% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NBGX or VTI?
Over the past year NBGX returned +10.98% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NBGX annualized +12.77% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NBGX or VTI?
NBGX has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NBGX -21.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both NBGX and VTI?
NBGX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between NBGX and VTI?
NBGX and VTI share 46 common holdings with a 40.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBGX or VTI?
NBGX yields 0.40% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.