NIHI vs VTI
NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, NIHI or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NIHI | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $197M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 9.72% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 4 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +1.33% | +12.28%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.39% | +16.78%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.89% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3%Best | 13.1% |
| Fund Family | NEOS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 17, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
NIHI vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NIHI vs VTI Performance
NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI) is an ETF from NEOS and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NIHI returned +6.39% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, NIHI is up 1.33% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.1% compared with 12.3% for NIHI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NIHI charges 0.68% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NIHI currently yields 9.72% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in NIHI and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 100.0% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in NIHI and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 4 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NIHI and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NIHI or VTI?
NIHI has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NIHI or VTI?
Over the past year NIHI returned +6.39% vs +16.78% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NIHI or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 13.1% annualized versus 12.3% for NIHI.
Should I hold both NIHI and VTI?
NIHI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NIHI or VTI?
NIHI yields 9.72% while VTI yields 1.03%, so NIHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than NIHI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.