NMAR vs VOO
Innovator Growth 100 Power Buffer ETF - March vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NMAR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $93M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +10.40% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.01% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 3, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
NMAR vs VOO Performance
Innovator Growth 100 Power Buffer ETF - March (NMAR) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NMAR returned +15.01% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, NMAR is up 10.40% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 7.1% for NMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.0% for NMAR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NMAR charges 0.79% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NMAR currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NMAR or VOO?
NMAR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NMAR or VOO?
Over the past year NMAR returned +15.01% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), NMAR annualized +16.96% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NMAR or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 7.1% for NMAR. Worst drawdown: NMAR -10.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both NMAR and VOO?
NMAR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
Which pays a higher dividend, NMAR or VOO?
NMAR yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.