NODE vs QQQ

NODE vs QQQ

Which is better, NODE or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. NODE led over the full window, QQQ over 1Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.5%.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNODEQQQ
Expense Ratio0.67%0.18%Best
AUM$58M$486.1B
Dividend Yield0.86%0.44%
Holdings49107
YTD Return+11.29%+17.54%Best
1Y Return+23.04%+25.59%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.63%
5Y Return (annualized)-+14.18%
Volatility (annualized)43.2%19.4%Best
Max Drawdown-36.0%-12.0%Best
$10,000 over 1.3 years$15,379Best$13,913
Top 10 Weight54.5%46.5%Best
Fund FamilyVanEckInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMay 13, 2025Mar 10, 1999

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 14, 2025 to Sep 4, 2026 (1.3 years).

NODE vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.

NODE vs QQQ Performance

VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) is an ETF from VanEck and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year NODE returned +23.04% while QQQ returned +25.59%. Year to date, NODE is up 11.29% versus a gain of 17.54% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NODE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.2% compared with 19.4% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.0% for NODE and -12.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NODE charges 0.67% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $67 vs $18 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NODE currently yields 0.86% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

NODE already in QQQ3.7%
QQQ already in NODE9.8%

3.7% of NODE's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 9.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings NODE also owns.

QQQ and NODE share little of their money.

4 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in NODE and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 49 and 107.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 93 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for NODE (88.5% of the fund), and 29 for NODE that do not appear in QQQ (69.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NODEWeight in QQQDifference
NVDANvidia Corp.1.15%8.44%7.29%
SHOP:CAShopify Inc. Cl A0.81%0.77%0.04%
CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com0.89%0.42%0.47%
MSTRMicrostrategy Inc0.86%0.14%0.72%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of NODE and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

NODEQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NODE or QQQ?

NODE has an expense ratio of 0.67% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, NODE or QQQ?

Over the past year NODE returned +23.04% vs +25.59% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), NODE annualized +39.25% vs +28.92% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, NODE or QQQ?

NODE has been the more volatile fund at 43.2% annualized versus 19.4% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: NODE -36.0% vs QQQ -12.0%.

Should I hold both NODE and QQQ?

NODE and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between NODE and QQQ?

9.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings NODE also owns. 9.8% of QQQ's is in holdings NODE also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in NODE and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, NODE or QQQ?

NODE yields 0.86% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so NODE currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than NODE?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. NODE led over the full window, QQQ over 1Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.