NODE vs VTI
VanEck Onchain Economy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, NODE or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. NODE led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NODE | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.67% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $58M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.76% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 49 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +12.97% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.02% | +18.17%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 43.3% | 11.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.0% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $15,831Best | $13,411 |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.0% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 13, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 14, 2025 to Sep 25, 2026 (1.4 years).
NODE vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
NODE vs VTI Performance
VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NODE returned +6.02% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, NODE is up 12.97% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NODE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.3% compared with 11.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.0% for NODE and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NODE charges 0.67% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $67 vs $3 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NODE currently yields 0.76% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
54.4% of NODE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 7.1% of VTI's money is in holdings NODE also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
24 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in NODE and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 49 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,131 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for NODE (90.3% of the fund), and 6 for NODE that do not appear in VTI (20.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NODE | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.33% | 6.40% | 5.07% |
| FIGRFigure Technology Solutions Inc | 5.80% | 0.00% | 5.80% |
| CIFRCipher Mining Inc | 5.26% | 0.01% | 5.25% |
| WULFTerawulf Inc | 5.10% | 0.01% | 5.09% |
| APLDApplied Digital Corp | 3.54% | 0.01% | 3.53% |
| RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc. | 3.40% | 0.01% | 3.39% |
| CLSKCleanspark Inc | 3.21% | 0.00% | 3.21% |
| CRCLCircle Internet Group In | 3.03% | 0.01% | 3.02% |
| MARAMarathon Patent Group Inc. | 3.03% | 0.01% | 3.02% |
| CORZCore Scientific Inc | 2.57% | 0.01% | 2.56% |
54.4% of NODE is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NODE or VTI?
NODE has an expense ratio of 0.67% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $64 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NODE or VTI?
Over the past year NODE returned +6.02% vs +18.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), NODE annualized +38.84% vs +23.32% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NODE or VTI?
NODE has been the more volatile fund at 43.3% annualized versus 11.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NODE -36.0% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both NODE and VTI?
NODE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NODE and VTI?
54.4% of NODE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 7.1% of VTI's is in holdings NODE also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in NODE and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, NODE or VTI?
NODE yields 0.76% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than NODE?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. NODE led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.