NUIB vs SCHZ
Nuveen Impact Bond ETF vs Schwab US Aggregate Bond ETF
Which is better, NUIB or SCHZ?
SCHZ costs less.
SCHZ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUIB | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $45M | $10.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 4.33% |
| Holdings | 58 | 24,843 |
| YTD Return | +0.30%Best | -0.85% |
| 1Y Return | - | -1.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -0.29% |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2026 | Jul 14, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight, Style.
NUIB vs SCHZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NUIB vs SCHZ Performance
Nuveen Impact Bond ETF (NUIB) is an ETF from Nuveen and Schwab US Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, NUIB is up 0.30% versus a loss of 0.85% for SCHZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUIB charges 0.37% per year while SCHZ charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $3 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUIB currently yields 0.00% against 4.33% for SCHZ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 58 holdings in NUIB and 10,307 in SCHZ, totalling 64.0% and 61.5% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 32 positions appear in both.
32 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in NUIB and 10,307 in SCHZ, against full books of 58 and 24,843.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NUIB | Weight in SCHZ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIIB 4.25 03/13/34Aiib 4.25 3/13/2034 | 2.17% | 0.00% | 2.17% |
| MA 1.9 03/15/31Mastercard Inc Sr Unsecured 03/31 1.9 | 2.00% | 0.00% | 2.00% |
| EIB 0.625 10/21/27European Investment Bank Mtn 0.63% Oct 21, 2027 | 1.81% | 0.00% | 1.81% |
| AEP 2.2 08/15/31 JPublic Service Company Of Oklahoma 2.2% Aug 15, 2031 | 1.80% | 0.00% | 1.80% |
| PCG 6.7 04/01/53Pacific Gas&Elec 6.7 04/01/2053 | 1.73% | 0.00% | 1.73% |
| AFDB V5.75 PERPAfrican Development Bank 5.75% | 1.68% | 0.00% | 1.68% |
| EIB 3.75 02/14/33European Invt Bk 3.75 02/14/2033 | 1.44% | 0.02% | 1.42% |
| LNT 4.1 09/26/28Interstate Power & Light Co | 1.40% | 0.00% | 1.40% |
| NRUC 4.15 12/15/32National Rural Utilities Cooperati 4.15 12/15/2032 | 1.21% | 0.00% | 1.21% |
| EDC 4.75 06/05/34Export Development Canada 4.75% Jun 05, 2034 | 1.20% | 0.00% | 1.20% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NUIB and SCHZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUIB or SCHZ?
NUIB has an expense ratio of 0.37% while SCHZ charges 0.03%. SCHZ is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUIB or SCHZ?
NUIB yields 0.00% while SCHZ yields 4.33%, so SCHZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHZ better than NUIB?
SCHZ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.