NVDS vs QQQ
Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, NVDS or QQQ?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.76, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NVDS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.15% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $17M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 21.23% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 6 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -32.86% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | -42.17% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -64.14% | +25.63%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 53.1% | 19.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $81 | $25,899Best |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 13, 2022 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.2 years).
NVDS vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.
NVDS vs QQQ Performance
Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVDS) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year NVDS returned -42.17% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, NVDS is down 32.86% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Over three years, NVDS compounded at -64.14% per year against +25.63% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +25.43% annualized vs -68.21%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NVDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.1% compared with 19.0% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.76. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NVDS charges 1.15% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $18 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVDS currently yields 21.23% against 0.44% for QQQ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NVDS and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NVDS or QQQ?
NVDS has an expense ratio of 1.15% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NVDS or QQQ?
Over the past year NVDS returned -42.17% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NVDS annualized -68.21% vs +25.43% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NVDS or QQQ?
NVDS has been the more volatile fund at 53.1% annualized versus 19.0% for QQQ.
Should I hold both NVDS and QQQ?
NVDS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.76, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NVDS or QQQ?
NVDS yields 21.23% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so NVDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than NVDS?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.76, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.