NVDS vs VTI
Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, NVDS or VTI?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.67, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NVDS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $17M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 21.23% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -32.86% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | -42.17% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -64.14% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 53.1% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $81 | $21,103Best |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 13, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.2 years).
NVDS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.
NVDS vs VTI Performance
Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVDS) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NVDS returned -42.17% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, NVDS is down 32.86% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, NVDS compounded at -64.14% per year against +21.01% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +19.46% annualized vs -68.21%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NVDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.1% compared with 14.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.67. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NVDS charges 1.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $3 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVDS currently yields 21.23% against 1.03% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NVDS and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NVDS or VTI?
NVDS has an expense ratio of 1.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $112 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NVDS or VTI?
Over the past year NVDS returned -42.17% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NVDS annualized -68.21% vs +19.46% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NVDS or VTI?
NVDS has been the more volatile fund at 53.1% annualized versus 14.6% for VTI.
Should I hold both NVDS and VTI?
NVDS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.67, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NVDS or VTI?
NVDS yields 21.23% while VTI yields 1.03%, so NVDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than NVDS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.67, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.