NVDS vs VOO
Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, NVDS or VOO?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.69, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NVDS | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $17M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 21.23% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 6 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -31.65% | +12.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | -44.18% | +17.03%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -63.78% | +21.25%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.08% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 53.2% | 14.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $82 | $21,438Best |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 13, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2022 to Sep 17, 2026 (4.2 years).
NVDS vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.
NVDS vs VOO Performance
Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVDS) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NVDS returned -44.18% while VOO returned +17.03%. Year to date, NVDS is down 31.65% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, NVDS compounded at -63.78% per year against +21.25% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +19.91% annualized vs -68.10%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NVDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.2% compared with 14.3% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.69. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NVDS charges 1.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $3 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVDS currently yields 21.23% against 1.04% for VOO.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NVDS and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NVDS or VOO?
NVDS has an expense ratio of 1.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $112 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NVDS or VOO?
Over the past year NVDS returned -44.18% vs +17.03% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NVDS annualized -68.10% vs +19.91% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NVDS or VOO?
NVDS has been the more volatile fund at 53.2% annualized versus 14.3% for VOO.
Should I hold both NVDS and VOO?
NVDS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.69, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NVDS or VOO?
NVDS yields 21.23% while VOO yields 1.04%, so NVDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than NVDS?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.69, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.