NVIR vs VXUS
Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. NVIR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NVIR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $6M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.77% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 41 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +21.31% | +15.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.57% | +26.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.91% | +19.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Horizon Kinetics LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 21, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
NVIR vs VXUS Performance
Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR) is a ETF from Horizon Kinetics LLC and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NVIR returned +33.57% while VXUS returned +26.32%. Year to date, NVIR is up 21.31% versus a gain of 15.24% for VXUS.
Over three years, NVIR compounded at +14.91% per year against +19.85% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, NVIR has the edge at +16.38% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.6% for NVIR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.5% for NVIR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NVIR charges 0.85% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $5 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVIR currently yields 0.77% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
NVIR and VXUS share 1 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NVIR | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| EFX:CA | 4.33% | 0.00% | 4.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NVIR or VXUS?
NVIR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $80 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NVIR or VXUS?
Over the past year NVIR returned +33.57% vs +26.32% for VXUS, so NVIR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NVIR annualized +16.38% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NVIR or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.6% for NVIR. Worst drawdown: NVIR -22.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both NVIR and VXUS?
NVIR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NVIR and VXUS?
NVIR and VXUS share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NVIR or VXUS?
NVIR yields 0.77% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.