NVIR vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. NVIR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: NVIRMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNVIRVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.85%0.03%
AUM$6M$979.0B
Dividend Yield0.77%1.09%
Holdings41509
YTD Return+21.31%+14.48%
1Y Return+33.57%+22.02%
3Y Return (annualized)+14.91%+21.80%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.36%
Volatility (annualized)14.6%14.2%
Max Drawdown-22.5%-34.3%
Fund FamilyHorizon Kinetics LLCVanguard (US)
CategoryCommodityEquity
InceptionFeb 21, 2023Sep 7, 2010

NVIR vs VOO Performance

Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR) is a ETF from Horizon Kinetics LLC and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NVIR returned +33.57% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, NVIR is up 21.31% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.

Over three years, NVIR compounded at +14.91% per year against +21.80% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, NVIR has the edge at +16.38% annualized vs +13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NVIR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.5% for NVIR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NVIR charges 0.85% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVIR currently yields 0.77% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

NVIR and VOO share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NVIR or VOO?

NVIR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.

Which performed better, NVIR or VOO?

Over the past year NVIR returned +33.57% vs +22.02% for VOO, so NVIR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NVIR annualized +16.38% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, NVIR or VOO?

NVIR has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: NVIR -22.5% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both NVIR and VOO?

NVIR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between NVIR and VOO?

NVIR and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, NVIR or VOO?

NVIR yields 0.77% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.