OAEM vs VTI
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. OAEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OAEM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $130M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 49 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +29.26% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +49.52% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.12% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | OneAscent Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
OAEM vs VTI Performance
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) is a ETF from OneAscent Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OAEM returned +49.52% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, OAEM is up 29.26% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, OAEM compounded at +22.12% per year against +21.54% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, OAEM has the edge at +19.80% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OAEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.1% for OAEM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OAEM charges 1.25% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $125 vs $3 annually, a gap of $122 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OAEM currently yields 0.60% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
OAEM and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2832 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OAEM or VTI?
OAEM has an expense ratio of 1.25% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $122 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OAEM or VTI?
Over the past year OAEM returned +49.52% vs +21.39% for VTI, so OAEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), OAEM annualized +19.80% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OAEM or VTI?
OAEM has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: OAEM -17.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both OAEM and VTI?
OAEM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OAEM and VTI?
OAEM and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2832 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OAEM or VTI?
OAEM yields 0.60% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.