ODDS vs VTI
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ODDS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.74% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 46 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -12.53% | +14.16% | |
| 1Y Return | -22.80% | +23.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.78% | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
ODDS vs VTI Performance
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ODDS returned -22.80% while VTI returned +23.62%. Year to date, ODDS is down 12.53% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.
Over three years, ODDS compounded at +9.78% per year against +21.43% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +7.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ODDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for ODDS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ODDS charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ODDS currently yields 0.74% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ODDS and VTI share 6 holdings out of 2820 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ODDS or VTI?
ODDS has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ODDS or VTI?
Over the past year ODDS returned -22.80% vs +23.62% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), ODDS annualized +7.99% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ODDS or VTI?
ODDS has been the more volatile fund at 22.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ODDS -35.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ODDS and VTI?
ODDS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ODDS and VTI?
ODDS and VTI share 6 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2820 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ODDS or VTI?
ODDS yields 0.74% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.