ODDS vs VTI
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ODDS or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ODDS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 48 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -15.47% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | -28.33% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.15% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1% | -19.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.4 years | $13,451 | $17,936Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 54.6% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 11, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.4 years).
ODDS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.4 years both funds cover.
ODDS vs VTI Performance
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF (ODDS) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ODDS returned -28.33% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, ODDS is down 15.47% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, ODDS compounded at +10.15% per year against +21.01% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.20% annualized vs +6.97%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ODDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for ODDS and -19.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ODDS charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ODDS currently yields 0.69% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
26.6% of ODDS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's money is in holdings ODDS also owns.
ODDS and VTI share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in ODDS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 48 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,145 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ODDS (97.3% of the fund), and 5 for ODDS that do not appear in VTI (12.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ODDS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLTR:LNFlutter Entertainment Plc | 7.25% | 0.02% | 7.23% |
| DKNGDraft Kings Inc. | 6.90% | 0.02% | 6.88% |
| RSIRush Street Interactive Inc | 3.11% | 0.00% | 3.11% |
| TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 2.98% | 0.06% | 2.92% |
| RBLXRoblox Corp., Class A | 2.54% | 0.03% | 2.51% |
| UUnity Software Inc. | 2.51% | 0.02% | 2.49% |
| GMEGamestop Corp | 1.27% | 0.01% | 1.26% |
26.6% of ODDS is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ODDS or VTI?
ODDS has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ODDS or VTI?
Over the past year ODDS returned -28.33% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), ODDS annualized +6.97% vs +14.20% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ODDS or VTI?
ODDS has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ODDS -35.1% vs VTI -19.4%.
Should I hold both ODDS and VTI?
ODDS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ODDS and VTI?
26.6% of ODDS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's is in holdings ODDS also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in ODDS and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ODDS or VTI?
ODDS yields 0.69% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ODDS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.