OMAH vs QQQ
VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, OMAH or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OMAH | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 15.46% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 91 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +4.50% | +22.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.18% | +24.33%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +29.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.00% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.0%Best | 18.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.8%Best | -17.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $11,197 | $15,149Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 59.9% | 47.2%Best |
| Fund Family | VistaShares | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 5, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 5, 2025 to Oct 2, 2026 (1.6 years).
OMAH vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
OMAH vs QQQ Performance
VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) is an ETF from VistaShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year OMAH returned +6.18% while QQQ returned +24.33%. Year to date, OMAH is up 4.50% versus a gain of 22.67% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 7.0% for OMAH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.8% for OMAH and -17.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.19. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OMAH charges 0.98% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $18 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OMAH currently yields 15.46% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
23.3% of OMAH's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 14.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings OMAH also owns.
OMAH and QQQ share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in OMAH and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 91 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 92 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for OMAH (83.8% of the fund), and 18 for OMAH that do not appear in QQQ (76.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
23.3% of OMAH is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OMAH or QQQ?
OMAH has an expense ratio of 0.98% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $80 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OMAH or QQQ?
Over the past year OMAH returned +6.18% vs +24.33% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), OMAH annualized +7.32% vs +29.64% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OMAH or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 7.0% for OMAH. Worst drawdown: OMAH -11.8% vs QQQ -17.0%.
Should I hold both OMAH and QQQ?
OMAH and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.19, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between OMAH and QQQ?
23.3% of OMAH's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 14.0% of QQQ's is in holdings OMAH also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in OMAH and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, OMAH or QQQ?
OMAH yields 15.46% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so OMAH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than OMAH?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.