OMAH vs QQQ
VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OMAH | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1.1B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.00% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 91 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +7.56% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.37% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | VistaShares | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 5, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
OMAH vs QQQ Performance
VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) is a ETF from VistaShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year OMAH returned +10.37% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, OMAH is up 7.56% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 6.7% for OMAH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.8% for OMAH and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OMAH charges 0.98% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $18 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OMAH currently yields 15.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
OMAH and QQQ share 4 holdings out of 120 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OMAH or QQQ?
OMAH has an expense ratio of 0.98% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $80 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OMAH or QQQ?
Over the past year OMAH returned +10.37% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), OMAH annualized +10.07% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OMAH or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 6.7% for OMAH. Worst drawdown: OMAH -11.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both OMAH and QQQ?
OMAH and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OMAH and QQQ?
OMAH and QQQ share 4 common holdings with a 13.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 120 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OMAH or QQQ?
OMAH yields 15.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so OMAH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.