OMAH vs VOO
VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OMAH | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $967M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.79% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 94 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +7.91% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.96% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.6% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | VistaShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 5, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
OMAH vs VOO Performance
VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) is a ETF from VistaShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OMAH returned +10.96% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, OMAH is up 7.91% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 6.6% for OMAH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.8% for OMAH and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OMAH charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OMAH currently yields 15.79% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
OMAH and VOO share 20 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OMAH or VOO?
OMAH has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OMAH or VOO?
Over the past year OMAH returned +10.96% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), OMAH annualized +10.48% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OMAH or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 6.6% for OMAH. Worst drawdown: OMAH -11.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both OMAH and VOO?
OMAH and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OMAH and VOO?
OMAH and VOO share 20 common holdings with a 19.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OMAH or VOO?
OMAH yields 15.79% while VOO yields 1.09%, so OMAH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.