OMAH vs VTI
VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OMAH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.1B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 91 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +7.56% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.37% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | VistaShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 5, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
OMAH vs VTI Performance
VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) is a ETF from VistaShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OMAH returned +10.37% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, OMAH is up 7.56% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 6.7% for OMAH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.8% for OMAH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OMAH charges 0.98% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $3 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OMAH currently yields 15.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
OMAH and VTI share 20 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OMAH or VTI?
OMAH has an expense ratio of 0.98% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $95 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OMAH or VTI?
Over the past year OMAH returned +10.37% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), OMAH annualized +10.07% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OMAH or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 6.7% for OMAH. Worst drawdown: OMAH -11.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both OMAH and VTI?
OMAH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OMAH and VTI?
OMAH and VTI share 20 common holdings with a 13.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OMAH or VTI?
OMAH yields 15.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so OMAH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.