ORBX vs VTI
Global X Space Tech ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ORBX or VTI?
VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ORBX | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $41M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 40 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -19.48% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.95% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.81% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 14, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ORBX vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ORBX vs VTI Performance
Global X Space Tech ETF (ORBX) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, ORBX is down 19.48% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ORBX charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ORBX currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 52.4% of ORBX's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in ORBX and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 40 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ORBX | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASTSAst Spacemobile Inc Class A | 10.61% | 0.03% | 10.58% |
| RKLBRocket Lab Corporation | 9.50% | 0.08% | 9.42% |
| VSATViasat Inc | 6.75% | 0.02% | 6.73% |
| IRDMIridium Communications Inc | 5.53% | 0.00% | 5.53% |
| GSATGlobalstar Inc | 5.06% | 0.00% | 5.06% |
| PLPLANET LABS PBC | 4.09% | 0.01% | 4.08% |
| RDWRedwire Corp | 3.69% | 0.00% | 3.69% |
| YSSYork Space Systems Inc | 2.83% | 0.00% | 2.83% |
| BKSYBLACKSKY TECHNOLOGY INC | 1.51% | 0.00% | 1.51% |
| FEIMFrequency Electronics Inc | 1.14% | 0.00% | 1.14% |
52.4% of ORBX is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ORBX or VTI?
ORBX has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ORBX and VTI?
At least 52.4% of ORBX's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in ORBX and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ORBX or VTI?
ORBX yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ORBX?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.