PAMC vs VOO
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PAMC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $55M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 153 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +16.10% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.61% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.65% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.03% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.3% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
PAMC vs VOO Performance
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PAMC returned +21.61% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, PAMC is up 16.10% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, PAMC compounded at +16.65% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.03% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, PAMC has the edge at +15.38% annualized vs +13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PAMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.0% for PAMC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PAMC charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PAMC currently yields 1.09% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
PAMC and VOO share 0 holdings out of 523 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PAMC or VOO?
PAMC has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PAMC or VOO?
Over the past year PAMC returned +21.61% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), PAMC annualized +15.38% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PAMC or VOO?
PAMC has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: PAMC -27.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both PAMC and VOO?
PAMC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PAMC and VOO?
PAMC and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 523 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PAMC or VOO?
PAMC yields 1.09% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.