PAMC vs VXUS
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. PAMC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PAMC | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $55M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 153 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +14.93% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.35% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.54% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.87% | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
PAMC vs VXUS Performance
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PAMC returned +27.35% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, PAMC is up 14.93% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Over three years, PAMC compounded at +16.54% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +9.87% and +9.14% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, PAMC has the edge at +15.21% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PAMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.0% for PAMC and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PAMC charges 0.60% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $5 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PAMC currently yields 1.09% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
PAMC and VXUS share 1 holdings out of 7878 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PAMC | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| RBA:CA | 0.88% | 0.04% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PAMC or VXUS?
PAMC has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PAMC or VXUS?
Over the past year PAMC returned +27.35% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so PAMC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), PAMC annualized +15.21% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PAMC or VXUS?
PAMC has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: PAMC -27.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both PAMC and VXUS?
PAMC and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PAMC and VXUS?
PAMC and VXUS share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7878 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PAMC or VXUS?
PAMC yields 1.09% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.