PCSG vs VOO
Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, PCSG or VOO?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. PCSG is less concentrated, with 25.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PCSG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 86 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -9.06% | +11.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.45% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.19% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.4%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Polen Capital | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 18, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PCSG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PCSG vs VOO Performance
Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF (PCSG) is an ETF from Polen Capital and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, PCSG is down 9.06% versus a gain of 11.98% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PCSG charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PCSG currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
2.4% of PCSG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's money is in holdings PCSG also owns.
PCSG and VOO share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 86 positions we hold weights for in PCSG and 494 in VOO, against full books of 86 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 485 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for PCSG (99.1% of the fund), and 74 for PCSG that do not appear in VOO (85.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PCSG and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PCSG or VOO?
PCSG has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between PCSG and VOO?
2.4% of PCSG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's is in holdings PCSG also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 86 positions we hold weights for in PCSG and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, PCSG or VOO?
PCSG yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than PCSG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. PCSG is less concentrated, with 25.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.