PCSG vs VYM
Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, PCSG or VYM?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PCSG is less concentrated, with 25.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PCSG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 86 | 613 |
| YTD Return | -6.66% | +11.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.4%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | Polen Capital | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 18, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PCSG vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PCSG vs VYM Performance
Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF (PCSG) is an ETF from Polen Capital and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, PCSG is down 6.66% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PCSG charges 0.60% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $4 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PCSG currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
5.8% of PCSG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.2% of VYM's money is in holdings PCSG also owns.
PCSG and VYM share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 86 positions we hold weights for in PCSG and 557 in VYM, against full books of 86 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 522 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for PCSG (96.9% of the fund), and 70 for PCSG that do not appear in VYM (81.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PCSG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PCSG or VYM?
PCSG has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between PCSG and VYM?
5.8% of PCSG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.2% of VYM's is in holdings PCSG also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 86 positions we hold weights for in PCSG and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, PCSG or VYM?
PCSG yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than PCSG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PCSG is less concentrated, with 25.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.