PID vs VTI
Invesco International Dividend Achievers ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PID | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.53% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $919M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.42% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 66 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +6.62% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.25% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.09% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.85% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2005 | May 24, 2001 |
PID vs VTI Performance
Invesco International Dividend Achievers ETF (PID) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PID returned +13.25% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, PID is up 6.62% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, PID compounded at +14.09% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.85% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +3.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PID has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.8% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.0% for PID and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PID charges 0.53% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $53 vs $3 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PID currently yields 3.42% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PID and VTI share 5 holdings out of 2844 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PID or VTI?
PID has an expense ratio of 0.53% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $50 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PID or VTI?
Over the past year PID returned +13.25% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), PID annualized +3.05% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PID or VTI?
PID has been the more volatile fund at 17.8% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PID -68.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PID and VTI?
PID and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PID and VTI?
PID and VTI share 5 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2844 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PID or VTI?
PID yields 3.42% while VTI yields 1.07%, so PID currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.