PID vs VYM
Invesco International Dividend Achievers ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PID | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.53% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $919M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.42% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 66 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +6.62% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.25% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.09% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.85% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2005 | Nov 10, 2006 |
PID vs VYM Performance
Invesco International Dividend Achievers ETF (PID) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PID returned +13.25% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, PID is up 6.62% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, PID compounded at +14.09% per year against +19.03% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +8.85% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.10% annualized vs +3.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PID has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.0% for PID and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PID charges 0.53% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $53 vs $4 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PID currently yields 3.42% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
PID and VYM share 1 holdings out of 664 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PID | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DOX | 1.65% | 0.02% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PID or VYM?
PID has an expense ratio of 0.53% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $49 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PID or VYM?
Over the past year PID returned +13.25% vs +24.22% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), PID annualized +3.05% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PID or VYM?
PID has been the more volatile fund at 17.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PID -68.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PID and VYM?
PID and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PID and VYM?
PID and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 664 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PID or VYM?
PID yields 3.42% while VYM yields 2.24%, so PID currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.