PIT vs VXUS

PIT vs VXUS

Which is better, PIT or VXUS?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. PIT led over 1Y, VXUS over 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VXUSHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPITVXUS
Expense Ratio0.55%0.05%Best
AUM$300M$158.1B
Dividend Yield5.94%2.51%
Holdings68,747
YTD Return+57.73%Best+13.64%
1Y Return+54.44%Best+20.82%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.23%+19.58%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.14%
Volatility (annualized)18.0%12.7%Best
Max Drawdown-17.2%-13.6%Best
$10,000 over 3.7 years$18,316$18,501Best
Fund FamilyVanEckVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 20, 2022Jan 26, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 22, 2022 to Sep 17, 2026 (3.7 years).

PIT vs VXUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.7 years both funds cover.

PIT vs VXUS Performance

VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PIT returned +54.44% while VXUS returned +20.82%. Year to date, PIT is up 57.73% versus a gain of 13.64% for VXUS.

Over three years, PIT compounded at +19.23% per year against +19.58% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +18.09% annualized vs +17.77%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PIT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 12.7% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.2% for PIT and -13.6% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.07. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PIT charges 0.55% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $5 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PIT currently yields 5.94% against 2.51% for VXUS.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PIT and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PITVXUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PIT or VXUS?

PIT has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PIT or VXUS?

Over the past year PIT returned +54.44% vs +20.82% for VXUS, so PIT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), PIT annualized +17.77% vs +18.09% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, PIT or VXUS?

PIT has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 12.7% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: PIT -17.2% vs VXUS -13.6%.

Should I hold both PIT and VXUS?

PIT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.07, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, PIT or VXUS?

PIT yields 5.94% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so PIT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VXUS better than PIT?

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. PIT led over 1Y, VXUS over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.