PJUN vs VYM
PJUN vs VYM
Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - June vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PJUN | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $959M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +5.15% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.62% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.46% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.04% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 31, 2019 | Nov 10, 2006 |
PJUN vs VYM Performance
Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - June (PJUN) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PJUN returned +9.62% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, PJUN is up 5.15% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, PJUN compounded at +11.46% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +7.04% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, PJUN has the edge at +7.98% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 7.8% for PJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.3% for PJUN and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PJUN charges 0.79% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $4 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PJUN currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PJUN or VYM?
PJUN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PJUN or VYM?
Over the past year PJUN returned +9.62% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), PJUN annualized +7.98% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PJUN or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 7.8% for PJUN. Worst drawdown: PJUN -16.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PJUN and VYM?
PJUN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, PJUN or VYM?
PJUN yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.