PKW vs VTI
Invesco BuyBack Achievers ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PKW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.8B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.77% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 227 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +10.77% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.15% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.95% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.18% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
PKW vs VTI Performance
Invesco BuyBack Achievers ETF (PKW) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PKW returned +17.15% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, PKW is up 10.77% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, PKW compounded at +18.95% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.18% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, PKW has the edge at +9.84% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PKW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.3% for PKW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PKW charges 0.62% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $3 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PKW currently yields 0.77% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PKW and VTI share 170 holdings out of 2843 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PKW or VTI?
PKW has an expense ratio of 0.62% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $59 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PKW or VTI?
Over the past year PKW returned +17.15% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), PKW annualized +9.84% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PKW or VTI?
PKW has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PKW -55.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PKW and VTI?
PKW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between PKW and VTI?
PKW and VTI share 170 common holdings with a 2.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2843 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PKW or VTI?
PKW yields 0.77% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.