PKW vs VOO
Invesco BuyBack Achievers ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PKW | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.8B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.77% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 227 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +11.55% | +13.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.00% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.25% | +22.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.53% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2006 | Sep 7, 2010 |
PKW vs VOO Performance
Invesco BuyBack Achievers ETF (PKW) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PKW returned +18.00% while VOO returned +21.62%. Year to date, PKW is up 11.55% versus a gain of 13.20% for VOO.
Over three years, PKW compounded at +19.25% per year against +22.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.53% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.51% annualized vs +9.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PKW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.3% for PKW and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PKW charges 0.62% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $3 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PKW currently yields 0.77% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
PKW and VOO share 41 holdings out of 690 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PKW or VOO?
PKW has an expense ratio of 0.62% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $59 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PKW or VOO?
Over the past year PKW returned +18.00% vs +21.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PKW annualized +9.88% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PKW or VOO?
PKW has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: PKW -55.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both PKW and VOO?
PKW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between PKW and VOO?
PKW and VOO share 41 common holdings with a 2.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 690 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PKW or VOO?
PKW yields 0.77% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.