PNQI vs VYM
Invesco Nasdaq Internet ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PNQI | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $543M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 80 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | -2.94% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | -3.54% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.13% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.02% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 12, 2008 | Nov 10, 2006 |
PNQI vs VYM Performance
Invesco Nasdaq Internet ETF (PNQI) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PNQI returned -3.54% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, PNQI is down 2.94% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, PNQI compounded at +18.13% per year against +19.03% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +1.02% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, PNQI has the edge at +13.87% annualized vs +7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PNQI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.7% for PNQI and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PNQI charges 0.60% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $4 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PNQI currently yields 0.00% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PNQI or VYM?
PNQI has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PNQI or VYM?
Over the past year PNQI returned -3.54% vs +24.22% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), PNQI annualized +13.87% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PNQI or VYM?
PNQI has been the more volatile fund at 22.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PNQI -59.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PNQI and VYM?
PNQI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PNQI and VYM?
PNQI and VYM share 2 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 679 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PNQI or VYM?
PNQI yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.