POW vs QQQ
VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, POW or QQQ?
POW has been ahead.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. POW led over 1Y. POW is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | POW | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $58M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.15% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 63 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +25.55%Best | +17.21% |
| 1Y Return | +26.21%Best | +22.10% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.60% |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.8%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | VistaShares | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
POW vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
POW vs QQQ Performance
VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) is an ETF from VistaShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year POW returned +26.21% while QQQ returned +22.10%. Year to date, POW is up 25.55% versus a gain of 17.21% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
POW charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, POW currently yields 0.15% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
8.3% of POW's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 1.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings POW also owns.
POW and QQQ share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in POW and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 63 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 92 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for POW (96.4% of the fund), and 27 for POW that do not appear in QQQ (49.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of POW and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, POW or QQQ?
POW has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, POW or QQQ?
Over the past year POW returned +26.21% vs +22.10% for QQQ, so POW leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between POW and QQQ?
8.3% of POW's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 1.1% of QQQ's is in holdings POW also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in POW and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, POW or QQQ?
POW yields 0.15% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than POW?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. POW led over 1Y. POW is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.