POW vs VTI
VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, POW or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 34.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | POW | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $55M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 110 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | +1.70% | +8.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.83% | +11.14%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.84% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 43.0% | 13.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.4% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $10,218 | $10,812Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.2% | 34.6%Best |
| Fund Family | VistaShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 28, 2025 to Nov 6, 2026 (1 years).
POW vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
POW vs VTI Performance
VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) is an ETF from VistaShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year POW returned +1.83% while VTI returned +11.14%. Year to date, POW is up 1.70% versus a gain of 8.54% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
POW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.0% compared with 13.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.4% for POW and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
POW charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, POW currently yields 0.17% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
55.4% of POW's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.0% of VTI's money is in holdings POW also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
27 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in POW and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 110 and 3,542.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,104 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for POW (94.9% of the fund), and 5 for POW that do not appear in VTI (3.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in POW | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PWRQuanta Services Inc | 5.60% | 0.13% | 5.47% |
| ETNEaton Corporation Plc Ordinary Shares | 4.82% | 0.23% | 4.59% |
| GEVGe Vernova | 3.49% | 0.35% | 3.14% |
| POWLPowell Industries Inc | 3.42% | 0.01% | 3.41% |
| BELFABel Fuse Inc | 3.27% | 0.00% | 3.27% |
| HUBBHubbell Inc. Class B | 3.20% | 0.03% | 3.17% |
| BEBLOOM ENERGY CORP | 2.96% | 0.11% | 2.85% |
| AEPAmerican Electri | 2.97% | 0.09% | 2.88% |
| FPSForgent Power Solutions, Inc. (Class A) | 2.42% | 0.01% | 2.41% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 2.19% | 0.22% | 1.97% |
55.4% of POW is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, POW or VTI?
POW has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, POW or VTI?
Over the past year POW returned +1.83% vs +11.14% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), POW annualized +2.18% vs +8.12% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, POW or VTI?
POW has been the more volatile fund at 43.0% annualized versus 13.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: POW -39.4% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both POW and VTI?
POW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between POW and VTI?
55.4% of POW's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.0% of VTI's is in holdings POW also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in POW and 3,464 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, POW or VTI?
POW yields 0.17% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than POW?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 34.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.