PPI vs VTI
Astoria Real Assets ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PPI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PPI | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $162M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.31% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +13.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.63% | +21.07% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.55% | +20.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.71% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | AXS Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 30, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
PPI vs VTI Performance
Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) is a ETF from AXS Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PPI returned +24.63% while VTI returned +21.07%. Year to date, PPI is up 12.28% versus a gain of 13.12% for VTI.
Over three years, PPI compounded at +18.55% per year against +20.54% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, PPI has the edge at +14.16% annualized vs +8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PPI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for PPI and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PPI charges 0.57% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $3 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PPI currently yields 1.31% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PPI and VTI share 43 holdings out of 2822 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PPI or VTI?
PPI has an expense ratio of 0.57% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PPI or VTI?
Over the past year PPI returned +24.63% vs +21.07% for VTI, so PPI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), PPI annualized +14.16% vs +8.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PPI or VTI?
PPI has been the more volatile fund at 19.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PPI -24.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PPI and VTI?
PPI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PPI and VTI?
PPI and VTI share 43 common holdings with a 3.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2822 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PPI or VTI?
PPI yields 1.31% while VTI yields 1.07%, so PPI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.