PPI vs VYM
Astoria Real Assets ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PPI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PPI | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $163M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.31% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 89 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +12.81% | +14.84% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.71% | +20.88% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.05% | +18.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.04% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | AXS Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 30, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
PPI vs VYM Performance
Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) is a ETF from AXS Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PPI returned +24.71% while VYM returned +20.88%. Year to date, PPI is up 12.81% versus a gain of 14.84% for VYM.
Over three years, PPI compounded at +19.05% per year against +18.34% for VYM. Across the full 5-year window we track, PPI has the edge at +14.30% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PPI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.0% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for PPI and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PPI charges 0.58% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $4 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PPI currently yields 1.31% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
PPI and VYM share 18 holdings out of 663 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PPI or VYM?
PPI has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PPI or VYM?
Over the past year PPI returned +24.71% vs +20.88% for VYM, so PPI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), PPI annualized +14.30% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PPI or VYM?
PPI has been the more volatile fund at 19.0% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PPI -24.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PPI and VYM?
PPI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PPI and VYM?
PPI and VYM share 18 common holdings with a 6.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 663 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PPI or VYM?
PPI yields 1.31% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.