PSCF vs VOO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. PSCF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSCF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $28M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.12% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 168 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +17.57% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.23% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.57% | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.05% | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -49.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2010 | Sep 7, 2010 |
PSCF vs VOO Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSCF returned +22.23% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, PSCF is up 17.57% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Over three years, PSCF compounded at +18.57% per year against +22.09% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +6.05% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.50% annualized vs +6.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSCF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.9% for PSCF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSCF charges 0.29% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSCF currently yields 2.12% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
PSCF and VOO share 0 holdings out of 671 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSCF or VOO?
PSCF has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSCF or VOO?
Over the past year PSCF returned +22.23% vs +20.69% for VOO, so PSCF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PSCF annualized +6.97% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSCF or VOO?
PSCF has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: PSCF -49.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both PSCF and VOO?
PSCF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSCF and VOO?
PSCF and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 671 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSCF or VOO?
PSCF yields 2.12% while VOO yields 1.08%, so PSCF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.