PSR vs VTI
Invesco Active US Real Estate ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PSR or VTI?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $55M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.56% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 72 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +8.77% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.30% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.05% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.04% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.4% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -43.0% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,531 | $18,286Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 59.6% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 20, 2008 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 21, 2008 to Oct 2, 2026 (17.9 years).
PSR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 17.9 years both funds cover.
PSR vs VTI Performance
Invesco Active US Real Estate ETF (PSR) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSR returned +7.30% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, PSR is up 8.77% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, PSR compounded at +11.05% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +1.04% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.02% annualized vs +10.02%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.0% for PSR and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSR charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSR currently yields 2.56% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
100.0% of PSR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.5% of VTI's money is in holdings PSR also owns.
Most of PSR is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, PSR as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
33 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in PSR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 72 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,117 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for PSR (95.9% of the fund), and 1 for PSR that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PSR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WELLWelltower, Inc. | 10.16% | 0.23% | 9.93% |
| PLDPrologis Inc | 9.38% | 0.19% | 9.19% |
| AMTAmerican Tower Corporation | 8.54% | 0.11% | 8.43% |
| EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust | 7.61% | 0.14% | 7.47% |
| DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc. | 5.52% | 0.09% | 5.43% |
| TRNOTerreno Realty Corp | 3.89% | 0.01% | 3.88% |
| PSAPublic Storage | 3.73% | 0.08% | 3.65% |
| CPTCamden Property Trust Common Stock | 3.62% | 0.02% | 3.60% |
| WPCW.P Carey Inc. | 3.59% | 0.02% | 3.57% |
| UDRUdr Inc. | 3.53% | 0.02% | 3.51% |
100.0% of PSR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSR or VTI?
PSR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PSR or VTI?
Over the past year PSR returned +7.30% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), PSR annualized +10.02% vs +14.02% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PSR or VTI?
PSR has been the more volatile fund at 21.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PSR -43.0% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both PSR and VTI?
PSR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PSR and VTI?
100.0% of PSR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.5% of VTI's is in holdings PSR also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in PSR and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSR or VTI?
PSR yields 2.56% while VTI yields 1.03%, so PSR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PSR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.