PTIN vs QQQ
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, PTIN or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. PTIN led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. PTIN is less concentrated, with 17.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PTIN | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.67% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $184M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.11% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 510 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +17.31%Best | +16.87% |
| 1Y Return | +26.60%Best | +22.98% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.63% | +24.98%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.91% | +14.39%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5%Best | 20.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.3%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,967 | $19,586Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 17.0%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 2, 2019 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 3, 2019 to Sep 11, 2026 (7.4 years).
PTIN vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.4 years both funds cover.
PTIN vs QQQ Performance
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year PTIN returned +26.60% while QQQ returned +22.98%. Year to date, PTIN is up 17.31% versus a gain of 16.87% for QQQ.
Over three years, PTIN compounded at +14.63% per year against +24.98% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +6.91% and +14.39% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +20.16% annualized vs +7.17%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.3% compared with 13.5% for PTIN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.3% for PTIN and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PTIN charges 0.67% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $67 vs $18 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PTIN currently yields 2.11% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
3.8% of PTIN's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 2.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings PTIN also owns.
PTIN and QQQ share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 476 positions we hold weights for in PTIN and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 510 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 95 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for PTIN (97.0% of the fund), and 14 for PTIN that do not appear in QQQ (2.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PTIN | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASAsml Holding Adr Representing Nv | 2.75% | 0.68% | 2.07% |
| SHOP:CAShopify Inc. | 0.63% | 0.77% | 0.14% |
| ARM:LNArm Holdings American Depositary S | 0.16% | 0.51% | 0.35% |
| FER:ASFerrovial Se | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.07% |
| CCEP:LNCoca-Cola Europacific Partne | 0.09% | 0.21% | 0.12% |
| TRI:CAThomson Reuters Corp | 0.06% | 0.17% | 0.11% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PTIN and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PTIN or QQQ?
PTIN has an expense ratio of 0.67% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PTIN or QQQ?
Over the past year PTIN returned +26.60% vs +22.98% for QQQ, so PTIN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), PTIN annualized +7.17% vs +20.16% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PTIN or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.3% annualized versus 13.5% for PTIN. Worst drawdown: PTIN -21.3% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both PTIN and QQQ?
PTIN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PTIN and QQQ?
3.8% of PTIN's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 2.5% of QQQ's is in holdings PTIN also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 476 positions we hold weights for in PTIN and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, PTIN or QQQ?
PTIN yields 2.11% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so PTIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than PTIN?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. PTIN led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. PTIN is less concentrated, with 17.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.