PWV vs SCHD
Invesco Large Cap Value ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. PWV delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PWV | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $1.7B | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.74% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +22.58% | +25.58% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.54% | +31.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.11% | +15.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.49% | +9.61% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.7% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 3, 2005 | Oct 20, 2011 |
PWV vs SCHD Performance
Invesco Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year PWV returned +31.54% while SCHD returned +31.06%. Year to date, PWV is up 22.58% versus a gain of 25.58% for SCHD.
Over three years, PWV compounded at +21.11% per year against +15.55% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +14.49% and +9.61% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.46% annualized vs +8.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PWV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.7% for PWV and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PWV charges 0.55% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $6 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PWV currently yields 1.74% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
PWV and SCHD share 13 holdings out of 138 unique holdings combined, representing a 29.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PWV or SCHD?
PWV has an expense ratio of 0.55% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $49 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PWV or SCHD?
Over the past year PWV returned +31.54% vs +31.06% for SCHD, so PWV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), PWV annualized +8.77% vs +11.46% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PWV or SCHD?
PWV has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: PWV -50.7% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both PWV and SCHD?
PWV and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between PWV and SCHD?
PWV and SCHD share 13 common holdings with a 29.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 138 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PWV or SCHD?
PWV yields 1.74% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.