PXF vs VTI
Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-US ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PXF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PXF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.43% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.8B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.13% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 1,040 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +21.35% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.95% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.88% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.31% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -65.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
PXF vs VTI Performance
Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-US ETF (PXF) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PXF returned +36.95% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, PXF is up 21.35% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, PXF compounded at +24.88% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +14.31% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PXF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -65.7% for PXF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PXF charges 0.43% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $43 vs $3 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PXF currently yields 3.13% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PXF and VTI share 13 holdings out of 3776 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PXF or VTI?
PXF has an expense ratio of 0.43% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PXF or VTI?
Over the past year PXF returned +36.95% vs +22.19% for VTI, so PXF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), PXF annualized +3.56% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PXF or VTI?
PXF has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PXF -65.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PXF and VTI?
PXF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PXF and VTI?
PXF and VTI share 13 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3776 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PXF or VTI?
PXF yields 3.13% while VTI yields 1.07%, so PXF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.