PXJ vs VTI
Invesco Oil and Gas Services ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PXJ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PXJ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.63% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $62M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.62% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +53.06% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +83.26% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.37% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +25.40% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -95.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 26, 2005 | May 24, 2001 |
PXJ vs VTI Performance
Invesco Oil and Gas Services ETF (PXJ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PXJ returned +83.26% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, PXJ is up 53.06% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, PXJ compounded at +18.37% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +25.40% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -2.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PXJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.1% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -95.3% for PXJ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PXJ charges 0.63% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $63 vs $3 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PXJ currently yields 2.62% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PXJ and VTI share 14 holdings out of 2800 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PXJ or VTI?
PXJ has an expense ratio of 0.63% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $60 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PXJ or VTI?
Over the past year PXJ returned +83.26% vs +22.39% for VTI, so PXJ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), PXJ annualized -2.28% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PXJ or VTI?
PXJ has been the more volatile fund at 37.1% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PXJ -95.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PXJ and VTI?
PXJ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PXJ and VTI?
PXJ and VTI share 14 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2800 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PXJ or VTI?
PXJ yields 2.62% while VTI yields 1.07%, so PXJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.