PXJ vs VTI
Invesco Oil and Gas Services ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PXJ or VTI?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PXJ led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PXJ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.63% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $125M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.16% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 67 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +51.90%Best | +13.35% |
| 1Y Return | +68.93%Best | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.47% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +21.82%Best | +12.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.0% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -95.3% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $26,828Best | $18,286 |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.7% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 26, 2005 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 26, 2005 to Oct 2, 2026 (20.9 years).
PXJ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20.9 years both funds cover.
PXJ vs VTI Performance
Invesco Oil and Gas Services ETF (PXJ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PXJ returned +68.93% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, PXJ is up 51.90% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, PXJ compounded at +17.47% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +21.82% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.71% annualized vs -2.30%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PXJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.0% compared with 15.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -95.3% for PXJ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PXJ charges 0.63% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $63 vs $3 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PXJ currently yields 2.16% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
64.1% of PXJ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's money is in holdings PXJ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, PXJ as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
19 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in PXJ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 67 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,140 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for PXJ (97.3% of the fund), and 7 for PXJ that do not appear in VTI (19.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PXJ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HALHalliburton Co. | 5.09% | 0.03% | 5.06% |
| AROCArchrock, Inc. | 5.10% | 0.01% | 5.09% |
| NOVNov Inc Common Stock | 5.08% | 0.01% | 5.07% |
| 0RMV:LNTechnipfmc Plc Ordinary Shares | 4.85% | 0.04% | 4.81% |
| NENoble Corp Plc Ordinary Shares | 4.77% | 0.01% | 4.76% |
| BKRBaker Hughes Co | 4.57% | 0.08% | 4.49% |
| PTENPatterson-Uti Energy Inc | 2.93% | 0.01% | 2.92% |
| INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. | 2.86% | 0.01% | 2.85% |
| INVXInnovex Internat | 2.74% | 0.00% | 2.74% |
| RESRpc Inc Com Usd0.10 | 2.74% | 0.00% | 2.74% |
64.1% of PXJ is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PXJ or VTI?
PXJ has an expense ratio of 0.63% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PXJ or VTI?
Over the past year PXJ returned +68.93% vs +15.92% for VTI, so PXJ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), PXJ annualized -2.30% vs +9.71% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PXJ or VTI?
PXJ has been the more volatile fund at 37.0% annualized versus 15.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PXJ -95.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PXJ and VTI?
PXJ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PXJ and VTI?
64.1% of PXJ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's is in holdings PXJ also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in PXJ and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, PXJ or VTI?
PXJ yields 2.16% while VTI yields 1.03%, so PXJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PXJ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PXJ led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.