QBTZ vs VOO
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QBTZ or VOO?
Trading-Inverse Debt against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QBTZ | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.29% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 16 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -28.49% | +12.50%Best |
| 1Y Return | -69.62% | +17.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Debt | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 6, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QBTZ vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QBTZ vs VOO Performance
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QBTZ returned -69.62% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, QBTZ is down 28.49% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QBTZ charges 1.29% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $129 vs $3 annually, a gap of $126 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QBTZ currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in QBTZ and 505 in VOO, totalling 10.6% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, QBTZ as of Sep 1, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in QBTZ and 505 in VOO, against full books of 16 and 509.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QBTZ and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QBTZ or VOO?
QBTZ has an expense ratio of 1.29% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $126 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QBTZ or VOO?
Over the past year QBTZ returned -69.62% vs +17.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QBTZ or VOO?
QBTZ yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than QBTZ?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.