QCML vs SCHD
GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCML | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $57M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | -30.64% | +26.21% | |
| 1Y Return | -19.56% | +29.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.73% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.67% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 121.5% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.8% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
QCML vs SCHD Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF (QCML) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year QCML returned -19.56% while SCHD returned +29.99%. Year to date, QCML is down 30.64% versus a gain of 26.21% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QCML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 121.5% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.8% for QCML and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.11. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCML charges 1.50% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $6 annually, a gap of $144 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCML currently yields 0.00% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
QCML and SCHD share 1 holdings out of 100 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QCML | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 66.70% | 2.72% | 63.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCML or SCHD?
QCML has an expense ratio of 1.50% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $144 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCML or SCHD?
Over the past year QCML returned -19.56% vs +29.99% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QCML annualized -29.68% vs +11.50% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCML or SCHD?
QCML has been the more volatile fund at 121.5% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: QCML -68.8% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both QCML and SCHD?
QCML and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.11, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QCML and SCHD?
QCML and SCHD share 1 common holdings with a 2.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 100 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCML or SCHD?
QCML yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.