QCML vs SCHD
GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, QCML or SCHD?
Leverage Strategy against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCML | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $56M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 2 | 103 |
| YTD Return | -2.99% | +21.99%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.76% | +25.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.48% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 121.1% | 14.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -68.8% | -14.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $8,269 | $12,611Best |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Leverage Strategy | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 13, 2025 to Sep 23, 2026 (1.6 years).
QCML vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
QCML vs SCHD Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF (QCML) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year QCML returned -3.76% while SCHD returned +25.92%. Year to date, QCML is down 2.99% versus a gain of 21.99% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QCML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 121.1% compared with 14.3% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.8% for QCML and -14.0% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCML charges 1.50% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $6 annually, a gap of $144 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCML currently yields 0.00% against 3.00% for SCHD.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QCML and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCML or SCHD?
QCML has an expense ratio of 1.50% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $144 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QCML or SCHD?
Over the past year QCML returned -3.76% vs +25.92% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QCML annualized -11.20% vs +15.60% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QCML or SCHD?
QCML has been the more volatile fund at 121.1% annualized versus 14.3% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: QCML -68.8% vs SCHD -14.0%.
Should I hold both QCML and SCHD?
QCML and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCML or SCHD?
QCML yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than QCML?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.