QCML vs VYM
GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCML | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $57M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -30.64% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | -19.56% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 121.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QCML vs VYM Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF (QCML) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QCML returned -19.56% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, QCML is down 30.64% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QCML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 121.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.8% for QCML and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCML charges 1.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $4 annually, a gap of $146 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCML currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
QCML and VYM share 1 holdings out of 558 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QCML | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 66.70% | 0.67% | 66.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCML or VYM?
QCML has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $146 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCML or VYM?
Over the past year QCML returned -19.56% vs +24.43% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QCML annualized -29.68% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCML or VYM?
QCML has been the more volatile fund at 121.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QCML -68.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both QCML and VYM?
QCML and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QCML and VYM?
QCML and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 558 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCML or VYM?
QCML yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.