QCML vs VTI
GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCML | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $57M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -30.64% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -19.56% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 121.5% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
QCML vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF (QCML) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QCML returned -19.56% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, QCML is down 30.64% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QCML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 121.5% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.8% for QCML and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCML charges 1.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCML currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QCML and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2783 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QCML | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 66.70% | 0.27% | 66.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCML or VTI?
QCML has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCML or VTI?
Over the past year QCML returned -19.56% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QCML annualized -29.68% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCML or VTI?
QCML has been the more volatile fund at 121.5% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QCML -68.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QCML and VTI?
QCML and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QCML and VTI?
QCML and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2783 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCML or VTI?
QCML yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.