QCML vs VOO

QCML vs VOO

Which is better, QCML or VOO?

Leverage Strategy against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQCMLVOO
Expense Ratio1.50%0.03%Best
AUM$56M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings2509
YTD Return-2.99%+13.31%Best
1Y Return-3.76%+17.07%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.72%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.19%
Volatility (annualized)121.1%13.1%Best
Max Drawdown-68.8%-18.7%Best
$10,000 over 1.6 years$8,269$12,840Best
Fund FamilyGraniteSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleLeverage StrategyLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 13, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 13, 2025 to Sep 23, 2026 (1.6 years).

QCML vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.

QCML vs VOO Performance

GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF (QCML) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QCML returned -3.76% while VOO returned +17.07%. Year to date, QCML is down 2.99% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QCML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 121.1% compared with 13.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.8% for QCML and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QCML charges 1.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCML currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of QCML and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

QCMLVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QCML or VOO?

QCML has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $147 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, QCML or VOO?

Over the past year QCML returned -3.76% vs +17.07% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QCML annualized -11.20% vs +16.91% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, QCML or VOO?

QCML has been the more volatile fund at 121.1% annualized versus 13.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QCML -68.8% vs VOO -18.7%.

Should I hold both QCML and VOO?

QCML and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, QCML or VOO?

QCML yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than QCML?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.