QCML vs VOO
GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCML | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $57M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -30.64% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | -19.56% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 121.5% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QCML vs VOO Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF (QCML) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QCML returned -19.56% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, QCML is down 30.64% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QCML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 121.5% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.8% for QCML and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCML charges 1.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCML currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QCML and VOO share 1 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QCML | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 66.70% | 0.30% | 66.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCML or VOO?
QCML has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCML or VOO?
Over the past year QCML returned -19.56% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QCML annualized -29.68% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCML or VOO?
QCML has been the more volatile fund at 121.5% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QCML -68.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QCML and VOO?
QCML and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QCML and VOO?
QCML and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCML or VOO?
QCML yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.